EVM, Systemic Risk, Perpetual

I am happy to present you an article on electronic voting machines (EVM), systemic risk and permanent choices.

EVM Complexity: Understanding systemic risk

Electronic voting machines (EVM) have become an essential aspect of modern choices around the world. However, as in the case of any technology used in sensitive processes, such as choices, there are concerns about the potential risks associated with their use. Such a risk is a systemic risk, which means that certain conditions can fail or act wrong.

EVMS: A critical component of modern choices

Electronic voting machines (EVM) have been widely accepted as an electoral measure in recent decades. These cars allow voters to vote electronically, eliminating the need for physical paper voting processes and manual calculation. EVM is intended to ensure the integrity and accuracy of the electoral process, offering a safe and transparent way to divide voices.

Despite EVM benefits, they are also concerned about systemic risk. One of the most important concerns is that EVM can be vulnerable to hacking or false, which can harm the security and legitimacy of the elections. In addition, it is worrying for biased programming opportunities or handling the characters in the third.

Permanent choices: concept with honors and worries

The idea of ​​permanent elections means that choices should be kept constantly without interruption. This concept is often associated with a certain form of electronic voting system, when the votes are reached online, then processed and calculated automatically. However, there are some concerns about this idea.

First of all, there are questions about how such choices are systematized and administered. Voters will have to join or authenticate each time they vote? How would you handle mistakes or anomalies? Also, what would interrupted if the internet connection or another infrastructure is required for EVM?

In addition, constant choices can also cause concern about the fatigue of voters and reduced activity, as voters can be used to vote online and lose interest in participating the elections.

Systemic risk: Increasing concern

The risk of EVM is well documented. However, it is increasingly worried that these systems can be vulnerable to cyber attacks or other forms of malware. 2010 The Canadian government has launched a cyber security audit of its electronic voting system, which identified several vulnerabilities and weaknesses.

More recently, the national alliance of the US government has stressed the need for greater transparency and responsibility in the development and implementation of EVM. The organization warns that the systemic risk associated with these systems can be catastrophic if not examined.

Systemic risk reduction: History lessons

To alleviate the risks associated with EVM, it is very important to adopt a more nuanced approach to their development and implementation. This includes:

• Improved security testing : Regular safety testing and vulnerability assessments can help identify possible EVM deficiencies.

2.

3.

Conclusion

The complexity of electronic voting machines (EVM) raises important questions about the systemic risk and the possible consequences of these systems used in elections.